Assertion :An object projected with same velocity on the paths of different rough surfaces are brought to rest in different distances. Reason: The workdone against the friction depends on the path travelled by the object.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion.
One mass is projected with same speed on the different path. If the friction coefficient is different for different paths, the mass will travel different distances. But finally, work done against friction force=initial kinetic energy of the body. So in both the paths, work was done by friction force would be same.
And, $w o r k d o n e b y f r i c t i o n f o r c e = f r i c t i o n f o r c e o n b o d y \times d i s t a n c e t r a v e l l e d b y b o d y$ .
So both the statement are correct but they are not supporting each other.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

ASSERTION: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to a homologous series.

REASON: n-Pentane and n-Hexane belong to the same class of hydrocarbons and they differ by a - $C H_{2}$ - group.

Assertion (A) The enthalpy of reaction remains constant in the presence of a catalyst.

Reason (R) A catalyst participating in the reaction forms different activated complex and lowers down the activation energy but the difference in enrgy of reactant and product remains the same.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion – The non-fusible impurities present in iron ore are removed by $C a C O_{3}$ .

Reason: $C a C O_{3}$ which decomposes into $C a O$ and $C O_{2}$ . The $C a O$ formed reacts with $S i O_{2}$ to remove silica

Assertion (A) Order and molecularity are same.

Reason (R) Order is determined experimentally and molecularity is the sum of the stoichimetric coeffcient of rate determining elementary step.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program