Assertion :If L.C.M. {p, q} $=$ 30 and H.C.F {p, q} $=$ 5, then p.q $=$ 150 Reason: L.C.M. of (a, b) $\times$ H.C.F of (a, b) $=$ a.b.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
$p \times q = L C M (p, q) \times H C F (p, q) = 30 \times 5 = 150$
Hence, given statement is correct.
And the reason purely justifies the assertion as well.
Option A

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion (A) o-nitrophenol is less soluble in water than the m- and p-isomers.
Reason (R) m and p-nitrophenols exist as associated molecules.
(a) Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.
(e) Both assertion and reason are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

Q. Assertion : Two events A and B are such that

P (A) = \frac{1}{3}

and

P (B) = \frac{2}{3}

then

P (A \cup B) \geq \frac{2}{3}

Reason : If

P (B) > P (A)

, then

P (A \cup B) \geq P (B)

Assertion (A) Phenols give o-and p-nitrophenol on nitration with conc. $H N O_{3} a n d H_{2} S O_{4}$ mixture.
Reason (R) - OH group in phenol is o-,p-directing.
(a) Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.
(e) Both assertion and reason are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

Assertion (A) Order of the reaction can be zero or fractional.

Reason (R) We cannot determine order from balanced chemical equation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Assertion :If L.C.M. {p, q}= 30 and H.C.F {p, q} = 5, then p.q = 150 Reason: L.C.M. of (a, b) × H.C.F of (a, b) = a.b.

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertionp×q=LCM(p,q)×HCF(p,q)=30×5=150Hence, given statement is correct.And the reason purely justifies the assertion as well.Option A

Assertion :If L.C.M. {p, q} $=$ 30 and H.C.F {p, q} $=$ 5, then p.q $=$ 150 Reason: L.C.M. of (a, b) $\times$ H.C.F of (a, b) $=$ a.b.

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
$p \times q = L C M (p, q) \times H C F (p, q) = 30 \times 5 = 150$
Hence, given statement is correct.
And the reason purely justifies the assertion as well.
Option A