wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Assertion :X, because of unsound state of mind and not knowing the nature of the act, attacks Y, who in self-defence and in order to ward off the attack, hits him thereby injuring him. Y has not committed an offence. Reason: Y had a right of private defence against X.

A
Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Both assertion and reason are correct and reason is also the correct explanation for assertion.
Right of private defence is practiced by individuals to save themselves from physical harm or injury in case if someone attacks. X was of unsound mind but and was not aware to understand the consequences. Y has full right to save himself which causes X's injury to defend himself.
Hence, A is the correct option.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Thermodynamic Processes
PHYSICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon