wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Identify the sentence (2) that fits logically between sentences (1) and (3):

(1) My greatest strength is my exceptional teachers.
(2) __________________________
(3) It was due to this that I am able to think creatively.

A
I read a lot of books.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
They have given me the liberty to think individually and learn by experimentation.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
I have always liked to go to school and enjoyed learning.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
I have successfully cleared many competitive exams.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is D They have given me the liberty to think individually and learn by experimentation.

For the sentence (2) to logically fit between (1) and (3), it needs to connect with both (1) and (3). In the first sentence, the narrator describes his/her teacher as his/her greatest strength. The third sentence begins with, "It was due to this". Hence, we can infer that what is mentioned in the second sentence is the cause of the narrator's ability to think creatively (sentence 3). Hence, sentence (2) should speak about something the teachers did, which helped the narrator to think creatively.

Option A is incorrect because ‘reading books’ neither makes one think creatively, nor does it connect with the teachers mentioned in sentence (1).

Option B connects with sentence (1) as it explains that the teachers had given the narrator the liberty to think individually and learn by experimentation. This is the reason for the narrator's ability to think creatively (sentence 3). Hence sentence in option B fits logically between sentences (1) and (3). This is the correct answer as it refers to the 'teachers' by replacing it with 'they'.

Option C is incorrect because it talks about the narrator having liked going to school and having enjoyed learning. However, this does not explain how it helped the narrator to become creative. It does not also connect with the teachers mentioned in sentence (1). Hence, this is incorrect.

Option D is incorrect because it talks about the narrator having successfully cleared many competitive exams. This neither helps the person to be creative, nor does it connect with the teachers mentioned in sentence (1). Hence, this is incorrect.


flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
Q. I. Literary training was a difficult matter. I had neither the resources nor the literary equipment necessary, and I had not the time I would have wished to devote to the subject. We gave three periods at the most to literary training. Hindi, Tamil, Gujarati and Urdu were all taught, and tuition was given through the vernaculars of the boys. English was taught as well.

II. I had undertaken to teach Tamil and Urdu. The little Tamil I knew was acquired during voyages and in jail. I had not got beyond Pope's excellent Tamil handbook. My knowledge of the Urdu script was all that I had acquired on a single voyage, and my knowledge of the language was confined to the familiar Persian and Arabic words. Even my Gujarati was no better than that which one acquires at the school.

III. Such was the capital with which I had to carry on. In poverty of literary equipment my colleagues went one better than I. But my love for the languages of my country, my confidence in my capacity as a teacher, as also the ignorance of my pupils, and more than that, their generosity, stood me in good stead.

IV. Of text-books, about which we hear so much, I never felt the want. I do not even remember having made much use of the books that were available. I did not find it at all necessary to load the boys with quantities of books. I have always felt that the true text-book for the pupil is his teacher. I remember very little that my teachers taught me from books, but I have even now a clear recollection of the things they taught me independently of books.

V. Children take in much more and with less labour through their ears than through their eyes. I do not remember having read any book from cover to cover with my boys. But I gave them, in my own language, all that I had digested from my reading of various books, and I dare say they are still carrying a recollection of it in their minds. It was laborious for them to remember what they learnt from books, but what I imparted to them by word of mouth, they could repeat with the greatest ease. Reading was a task for them, but listening to me was a pleasure, when I did not bore them by failure to make my subject interesting. And from the questions that my talks prompted them to put, I had a measure of their power of understanding.

Adapted from The Story of My Experiments with Truth by M K Gandhi

Based on your understanding of the passage, answer below given question by choosing the correct option.

Which of the following is not true about children’s learning according to the author?

[0.8 marks]
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Rebirth and Karma
HISTORY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon