wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

LEGAL PRINCIPLE: Whoever intentionally uses force to any person, without that person's consent, in order to committing of any offence, or intending by the use of such force to cause, or knowing it likely to cause injury, fear, or annoyance to the person to whom the force is used, is said to use criminal force to that other.
FACTUAL SITUATION: Akash was burning some crackers in his house when his dog got scared and got unruly which scared his brother Mohsin. Can this be called criminal force?
DECISION will be _____.

A
Yes, because he did it intentionally
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
No, because law doesn't account for trivial things
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Yes, because it led to annoyance of Mohsin
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
No, because there was no mala fide intention
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is C No, because there was no mala fide intention
The legal principle in the very second word says that the act must be done intentionally. Thus, making it the very essence of the principle.
Akash had no intention to scare or cause injury, fear or annoyance to Mohsin. Neither could he have reasonably foreseen that his actions will scare Mohsin.
Therefore, Akash is not liable for any offence as he had no mala fide intention.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Losing Weight Using Physics
PHYSICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon