First published in England in 1914 (and the United States a year
later) as part of Frost's second book of poetry, “Mending Wall” was
written in the waning years of European imperialism and the onset
of World War I. Read in light of the time's geopolitics, geographers
might recognize a desire for clear distinction of emergent national
identities and colonial control. Understood ambivalently, one could
also read in the final lines of the poem a passing judgment of the political “darkness” in which the era moved. This early setting for
Frost's poem pushes us to understand that the issue of negotiating
boundaries and borders comes much earlier and in other types of
struggles than the contexts in which “Mending Wall” is currently
widely cited.
The popularity of “Mending Wall” took off with the wide circulation of the Complete Poems of Robert Frost in 1949 (Mieder,
2003) and reflects Frost's rising public profile (Gerber, 1982, p.
25). Not surprisingly, the poem struck a nerve during the Cold War.
With its “intense concern about drawing limits,” writes Axelrod
(2003), the poem “became one of Frost's most canonical texts …
It spoke to a people consumed with the burdensome task of
creating a ‘containing wall’ around communism” (p. 865; see also
Lippmann, 1947, p. 56). Constructing a more tangible barrier to back
up its own restrictions on movements across its border with the
West, the German Democratic Republic began construction on a
barbed wire fence in 1951 and closed the inner German border a
year later. An even more complete sealing, including construction
of the Berlin Wall, began in 1961 (Buchholz, 1994, pp. 56e57) and
gave Frost's poem a renewed immediacy.
Post-Cold War borders and more recent debates concerning
border barriers provide only the latest geographic context for
interpreting this poem. In many ways “Mending Wall” is a
Rorschach test in which proponents see and hear their own positions reflected in the narrative contours of the poem. And while
political geography has embraced the idea that impartiality is as
much a distracting pretense as a useful position from which to
produce scholarship, we believe that such a shift threatens to mask
the fact that all political positions emerge from a complex set of
determinationsdlike walls they are constructions that over time
appear to us as natural, self-evident, and self-explanatory truths.
To theorize “Mending Wall's” reception and understand its use
of spatial metaphors, we read the poem as a part of a collectively
imagined social space (after Lefebvre, 1991) whose boundaries are
continuously shifting but whose contours can be productively if
only partially delimited. “Mending Wall” and Frost's oeuvre more
generally provide an unusually rich opportunity to explore our
ambivalence vis-a-vis the external and internal Other ( Bhabha,
2004, p. 214). Equally important, like much of Frost's work this
poem evokes a powerful sense of place. As part of the tradition of
the loco-descriptive poem, it offers literary scholars and geographers a way to think about “position” in all the senses of that word
(see Potkay, 2011). The loco-descriptive poem, or romantic and
post-romantic ode, links external nature (phenomenological
awareness of the environment, scenes of nature, etc.) to the general
structure of subjectivity. Thus, Charles Olson, a late romantic, is able
to begin such a poem, “I come back to the geography of it” (the “it”
being the memory of a specific place) and end the same poem with
the lines, “polis is this” (the “this” being his embodied subjectivity;
Mahoney, 2012; Morton, 2002; Olson, 1983, pp. 184e185). The
poem then becomes a means of proprioception (Olson, 1997, pp.
181e183). Whether addressed from a postcolonial (Bhabha, 2004),
Queer Theory (Butler, 1997, p. 29), Marxian (Althusser, 1990), psychoanalytic, or political geographical perspective, proprioceptionethe ability to occupy and locate oneself provisionally in
spacedis an essential aspect of becoming a political subject.