Statement: Should all the practising doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost?
Arguments:
I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing?
II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.

Only argument I is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Only argument II is strong

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Either I or II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Neither I nor II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both I and II are strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B Only argument II is strong
A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong. Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed 'undemocratic'. So, I is vague.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Statement: Should all the practicing doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost?

Arguments:
I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing?
II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should all news be controlled by Government in a democracy?
Arguments: I. Yes, Variety of news only confuses people.
II. No, Controlled news loses credibility.

Statement: Should the government open more medical colleges in the country?

Argument:

I. Yes, there is urgent need of qualified doctors and the ratio between doctors and the citizens is the lowest in India.

II. No, the government should ensure quality education in the existing medical colleges as majority of the colleges lack necessary infrastructure.

Q. Question: Should there be a world Government?
Argument I: Yes, it will eliminate inter-state conflicts Argument II: No, Rich and Powerful countries will dominate it ______________.

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.

Statement : Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports?

Arguments : I. Yes, This money can be utilised for upliftment of the poor.
II. No, Sportspersons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

The correct option is B Only argument II is strongA doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong. Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed 'undemocratic'. So, I is vague.

The correct option is B Only argument II is strong
A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong. Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed 'undemocratic'. So, I is vague.