MyQuestionIcon

1

You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

Parliamentary Privileges

The dissentin...

Question

The dissenting judgement in Puttaswamy case upheld the Right to Privacy, but not as Fundamental Right.

A

True

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

B

False

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B False

Suggest Corrections

thumbs-up

0

Similar questions

Q. Recently, the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy (Privacy case) and Aadhar judgement has used ‘Doctrine of Proportionality’ to determine the validity of legislation. In this context, explain what ‘Doctrine of Proportionality’ is

Q. Which of the following cases held the Right of Privacy as a fundamental right?

Q. The right to privacy is a part of which fundamental right?

Q. Consider the following statements:Which of the above statement(s) is/are correct?

Only 2
Both 1 and 2
None of the Above
Only 1

Q. In a landmark judgement of 2017, the Supreme Court of India ruled this right as a fundamental right. In a nine-judge constitution bench comprising of the Chief Justice of India (CJI), the verdict was unanimous. This judgement marked a watershed moment in the constitutional history of India. This right was considered an intrinsic part of right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the constitution. Which fundamental right is being talked about here?

View More

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

similar_icon

Related Videos

lock

Parliamentary Privileges

CIVICS

Watch in App

explore_more_icon

Explore more

Parliamentary Privileges

Standard X Civics

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

CrossIcon