Assertion :A woman is capable of sueing a man of refusing to own a child, who has blood group $O$ . The man has blood group $B$ and woman has $A$ . Reason: She is right as genetically, he can be the father of the child.

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
Genotype of child with O blood group is " $i i$ ". The man with B blood group ( $i^{B}$ $i$ ) and woman with A blood group ( $i^{A}$ $i$ ) can have a child with O blood group provided both are heterozygous for their respective blood groups. Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion. Correct answer is A.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Assertion :A woman is capable of sueing a man for refusing to own this child, he has blood group B and women has A while child has O. Reason: Genetically she is right, he can be father of the child.

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion (A) Phenols give o-and p-nitrophenol on nitration with conc. $H N O_{3} a n d H_{2} S O_{4}$ mixture.
Reason (R) - OH group in phenol is o-,p-directing.
(a) Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.
(e) Both assertion and reason are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

Assertion (A) Order of the reaction can be zero or fractional.

Reason (R) We cannot determine order from balanced chemical equation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Q. Assertion: Ray

\underset{A B}{\to}

has one end-point A.
Reason: Line segment

A B

has two end-points A and B.
(a) Both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is a correct explanation of Assertion.
(b) Both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not a correct explanation of Assertion.
(c) Assertion is true and Reason is false.
(d) Assertion is false and Reason is true.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Assertion :A woman is capable of sueing a man of refusing to own a child, who has blood group O. The man has blood group B and woman has A. Reason: She is right as genetically, he can be the father of the child.

Assertion :A woman is capable of sueing a man of refusing to own a child, who has blood group $O$ . The man has blood group $B$ and woman has $A$ . Reason: She is right as genetically, he can be the father of the child.