The Supreme Court decision in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford stated all the following EXCEPT:

A slave could not gain his or her freedom by moving to a free state or territory.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Slaves had the legal status of property, not people.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

The Founding Fathers had never intended for Africans to become U.S. citizens.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

The Missouri Compromise violated the Fifth Amendment.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Only individual states could decide whether a slave could become a citizen.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is E Only individual states could decide whether a slave could become a citizen.
Only individual states could decide whether a slave could become a citizen.- was an exception.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. In his opinion in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford, Chief Justice Taney stated all the following EXCEPT:

Q. In addition to bringing in Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state the Missouri Compromise also _______.

Q. Which of the following is true?

1

. Supreme Court's power to issue writs in narrower than that of High Courts

2

. A citizen is free to approach High Court or Supreme Court as he chooses, whenever his fundamental rights are violated

3

. The law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts throughout India.

Q. Consider the following:
1. Supreme Court's power to issue writs is narrower than that of High Courts.
2. A citizen is free to approach High Court or Supreme Court as he chooses, whenever his Fundamental Rights are violated.
3. The law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts throughout India.

Which of the above statement(s) is are correct?

I. "The Kansas-Nebraska Act authorizes the further extension of slavery and we have, do now, and will continue to protest most emphatically against slavery." (1854)

II. "The territories were the common property of the several states. As a joint agent of the states, Congress has no power to deny the citizens of any state the right to take their property into a territory Therefore slavery is legal in the territories. If Wilmot carries, woe, woe I say to the union." (1850)

III. "We beg the slave owners to pause before they proceed further to disturb the peace we had hoped the Compromise of 1850 would have made perpetual." (1854)

Which of the above statement(s) would John C. Calhoun have supported?

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

The Supreme Court decision in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford stated all the following EXCEPT:

The correct option is E Only individual states could decide whether a slave could become a citizen.Only individual states could decide whether a slave could become a citizen.- was an exception.

The correct option is E Only individual states could decide whether a slave could become a citizen.
Only individual states could decide whether a slave could become a citizen.- was an exception.