Difference between Financial Leverage and Operating Leverage


Leverage is a company’s capacity to utilise new resources or assets to make better returns or to diminish costs. Leverage is the reason that is influential for any organisation is extremely huge.

As a rule, leverage implies the impact of one protean or variable over another. In monetary administration, leverage isn’t vastly different; it implies an adjustment of one component, bringing about an adjustment of benefit. It suggests utilising such resources or sources of assets and sources of funds like debentures for which the organisation needs to pay fixed expenses or money or finance charges, to get additional earnings. There are three proportions of leverage that are financial leverage, operating leverage, and combined leverage. The financial leverage assesses the impact of interest costs, while the operating leverage estimates the impact of fixed cost.

There are two sorts of influence – operating leverage and financial leverage. At the point when we consolidate the two, we get a third kind of influence – combined leverage.

Combined leverage is the blend of the two leverages, i.e. financial leverage and operating leverage. While operating leverage outlines the impact of progress or effects of change in sales on the organisation’s working income or operating earnings, financial leverage mirrors the adjustment of EBIT on the EPS level.

Financial leverage, then again, takes a gander at different capital constructions and picks the one which diminishes burdens most. Operating leverage, from one viewpoint, compares how well a firm uses its proper expenses.

Meaning of Financial Leverage:

The usage of such sources of assets that convey fixed monetary charges or financial in an organisation’s monetary structure to procure more profit from speculation is known as financial leverage. The degree of financial leverage (DFL) is utilised to gauge the impact on earning per share (EPS) because of the adjustment of firms’ working benefit or operating profit, for example, EBIT.

At the point when an organisation utilises obligation assets in its capital construction having fixed monetary charges as interest, it is said that the firm utilised monetary influence.

The DFL depends on interest and money charges; in the event that these expenses are higher, DFL will likewise be higher, which will, at last, bring about the monetary gamble of the organisation. In the event that returns on capital employed > return on debt, the utilisation of obligation financing will be legitimised in light of the fact that, for this situation, the DFL will be viewed as positive for the organisation. As the premium remaining parts are steady, a little expansion in the EBIT of the organisation will prompt a higher expansion in the income of the investors not set in stone by the monetary influence. Henceforth, high DFL is appropriate.

The formula to calculate the degree of financial Leverage is

DFL = % Change in EPS / % Change in EBIT



Meaning of Operating Leverage:

The point when a firm uses fixed cost-bearing resources in its functional exercises or operational activities to procure more income to take care of its absolute expenses or total costs is known as operating leverage. The degree of operating leverage (DOL) is utilised to gauge the impact on earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) because of the adjustment of sales.

The firm, which utilises high fixed cost and the low factor cost, is viewed as high working leverage or operating leverage through the organisation, which has a low fixed cost, and the high factor cost is said to have less working influence or operating leverage. It is completely founded on fixed cost. Along these lines, the higher the fixed expense of the organisation, the higher will be the break-even point (BEP). Along these lines, the profits and the margin of safety of the organisation will be low, which mirrors that the business risk is higher. Thus, a low degree of operating leverage is favoured on the grounds that it prompts low business risk.

The formula to compute the degree of operating leverage is

DOL = % Change in EBIT / %Change in Sales


DOL = Contribution / EBIT

Difference between Financial Leverage and Operating Leverage:




The utilisation of such resources and assets in the organisation’s tasks for which it needs to pay fixed costs is known as operating leverage.

The utilisation of obligation or debt in an organisation’s capital design for which it needs to pay interest costs is known as financial leverage.



DOL = Contribution / EBIT

Risk Involved

It brings about business risk.

It leads to a monetary gamble or financial risk.



High, just when ROCE is higher.

Deduce by

It ascertains the organisation’s cost structure.

It ascertains the organisation’s capital structure.

Regards to

EBIT and sales.


Quantifies to

Impact of fixed working expenses or fixed operating costs.

Impact of Interest costs or interest expenses.


Financial leverage and operating leverage are both basic in their own terms. Furthermore, the two of them help organisations in creating better returns and lessen costs. So the inquiry remains can a firm utilise both of these influences? The response is yes.

On the off chance that an organisation can utilise its fixed costs well, it would have the option to create better returns just by utilising operating leverage. Furthermore, simultaneously, they can utilise financial leverage by changing their capital design from absolute value to 50-50, 60-40, or 70-30 value obligation extent or the debt proportion. Regardless of whether changing the capital structure would incite the organisation to pay interests, still, they would have the option to create a superior pace of profits and would have the option to lessen how much taxes they are to pay simultaneously.

That is the reason utilising financial leverage, and operating leverage is an extraordinary method for working on the rate of return of profits of the organisation and in lessening the expenses during a specific period.

Also, see:

Accounting for Share Capital

Trade Payables Turnover Ratio

Trade Receivables Turnover Ratio

Working Capital Turnover Ratio

Advantages of Straight Line Method and Written Down Value Method

Factors Affecting the Capital Structure

Difference Between Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy

Difference Between Trade Discount and Cash Discount

Difference Between Gross Investment and Net Investment

Difference Between Capital Reserve and Revenue Reserve

Leave a Comment

Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *