Coal India Seeks Exemption from Provisions of Competition Act

Coal India Ltd (CIL) approached the Supreme Court with a plea against the applicability of the Competition Act 2002 to its operations. In this article, you can read more about this plea of CIL, its arguments, the Competition Act and other details for the IAS exam.

Coal India Ltd and Competition Commission of India

In 2013, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) penalised Coal India Ltd. (CIL) for engaging in abusive practices and imposing unfair terms in Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) due to its dominant position.

• CIL appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that its coal mines are outside the purview of competition law.
• The Supreme Court is to give a verdict on this matter soon.

The Scope of the Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973:

• It is a legislation of expropriatory nature and is not directly associated with the trade and commerce of coal.
• The Act does not explicitly protect CIL from competition laws.

The Competition Act, 2002 and Exemptions:

• The Competition Act replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.
• Section 54 of the Competition Act, 2002, includes provisions for exemptions, and the government has utilised this authority in two instances. However, it has not granted an exemption to Coal India, thereby subjecting the company to the application of competition law.

Coal India’s Plea for Immunity from Competition Law

• CIL claims that being a statutory corporation established under the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act 1973, it should be exempt from the Competition Act.
• Coal India argues that its objective is to fulfil the State’s constitutional obligations and, therefore, it cannot be subject to the Competition Act.

CCI’s Assertions:

• The definition of “enterprise” in the Competition Law covers public sector companies, as per the CCI.
  • Public sector enterprises are subject to the rigour and discipline of the Competition Act, including prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position.
  • CCI argues that being a statutory corporation or a monopoly established under a statute does not exempt such enterprises from compliance with the Competition Act.
• Upholding competition laws ensures a level playing field for private and public enterprises, preventing any detrimental impact on the country.
  • CCI maintains that it is not dominance itself but the abuse of such a dominant position that is prohibited under the Competition Act.
  • CIL operates with a profit motive and increased its profits after the introduction of the New Coal Distribution Policy and the policy allows CIL to decide coal prices in Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) unilaterally.
  • CIL no longer engages in the retail sale of coal and primarily focuses on profitability.
• CCI emphasises that granting complete immunity to Coal India would permit an abusive dominant company to continue its anti-competitive practices.

Impact of the Verdict:

• The verdict is crucial in defining the regulatory framework for the coal sector. 
• The verdict will set a precedent for the treatment of public sector enterprises under competition law and define their obligations to promote fair competition in the market.
• The dispute raises questions about the balance between profit motives and public interest, highlighting the importance of fair competition in driving economic growth and protecting consumers’ interests.
• It is expected to reflect the tension between traditional economic policies and the market-oriented approach adopted by the country.
• This case has broader implications for India’s transition to a free market economy and challenges the notion that statutory monopolies can shield themselves from the discipline of competition law.

Coal India Seeks Exemption from Provisions of Competition Act:- Download PDF Here