07 Jun 2024: UPSC Exam Comprehensive News Analysis

07 June 2024 CNA
Download PDF Here

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. GS 1 Related
B. GS 2 Related
POLITY
1. ‘Bhil Pradesh’ in focus with BAP’s victory from Rajasthan tribal region
2. Similar poll symbols led to skewed results: NCP (SP)
3. CIC can’t comment on how MPs spend their funds, says Delhi HC
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
1. Spain to join South Africa’s Gaza case at top UN court accusing Israel of genocide
2. India is now ‘second-biggest foreign threat’ to Canadian democracy, says report
C. GS 3 Related
D. GS 4 Related
E. Editorials
POLITY
1. Bizarre judgment
F. Prelims Facts
1. NHRC seeks report on ‘sale of girls’ as part of Nata Pratha
2. Denmark, Pak., Somalia, Greece, and Panama get seats on the UNSC
3. Climate conference in November to emphasise ‘peace’ and ‘truce’
4. ‘India-Norway cooperation to witness manifold increase’
5. Major cause of inflammatory bowel disease discovered
G. Tidbits
H. UPSC Prelims Practice Questions
I. UPSC Mains Practice Questions
FIP Magazine

2. Similar poll symbols led to skewed results: NCP (SP)

Syllabus: Elections in India

Prelims: Poll symbols

Mains: Issues with poll symbols in India

Context​: The Nationalist Congress Party (Sharad Pawar) [NCP (SP)] achieved notable success in Maharashtra, winning 8 out of 10 seats contested in the Lok Sabha polls. However, party leaders expressed concerns that confusion over their new party symbol and similar symbols allotted to independent candidates resulted in a significant number of votes being diverted in at least four constituencies.

Background

  • Party Split: In July 2023, the NCP split, with Ajit Pawar joining the Eknath Shinde-BJP government, taking eight MLAs with him.
  • Symbol Allocation: The Election Commission (EC) awarded the original NCP symbol of a ‘clock’ to Ajit Pawar’s faction, while the Sharad Pawar faction received a new symbol of ‘a man blowing turha’ (tutari).

Election Campaign

  • Symbol Familiarization: The NCP (SP) and its Maha Vikas Aghadi allies worked to familiarize voters with the new symbol, calling it ‘tutari’ in Marathi.
  • EC’s Decision: The EC issued the symbol of a ‘trumpet’, also referred to as tutari in Marathi, to several independent candidates, causing voter confusion.

Issues

Symbol Confusion

  • Voter Confusion: Similarity between the ‘man blowing tutari’ and the ‘trumpet’ symbols caused confusion among voters.
  • EC’s Role: The EC’s allocation of similar symbols to independent candidates potentially influenced the election results.

Impact on Results

  • Vote Division: Diverted votes in critical constituencies potentially affected the margins of victory and overall results.
  • Allegations: NCP (SP) leaders alleged deliberate actions to divide votes by assigning similar symbols.

Significance

Electoral Integrity

  • Fair Elections: Ensuring distinct and recognizable symbols is crucial for maintaining electoral integrity and fairness.
  • Voter Awareness: Highlighting the need for better voter education and awareness regarding party symbols.

Political Implications

  • Party Strategy: Political parties may need to adapt their strategies and address symbol-related issues in future elections.
  • Regulatory Oversight: Calls for improved oversight by the EC to prevent similar issues in future elections.

Solutions

Regulatory Reforms

  • EC Guidelines: Strengthening EC guidelines to avoid assigning similar symbols that could confuse voters.
  • Clear Communication: Ensuring clear and distinct communication of party symbols to voters.

Voter Education

  • Awareness Campaigns: Conducting extensive voter awareness campaigns to familiarize voters with party symbols.
  • Community Outreach: Engaging with local communities to clarify symbol-related confusion.

Legal and Political Actions

  • Petitioning the EC: Presenting the party’s case to the EC to address and rectify symbol-related issues.
  • Legal Measures: Considering legal avenues to challenge any perceived unfair practices in symbol allocation.

Nut Graf: The confusion over similar poll symbols allegedly impacted a party’s performance in Maharashtra’s Lok Sabha elections. Addressing these issues through regulatory reforms, enhanced voter education, and proactive legal and political measures is essential for ensuring fair and transparent elections in the future. 

3. CIC can’t comment on how MPs spend their funds, says Delhi HC

Syllabus: Statutory, Regulatory and various Quasi-judicial Bodies

Mains: Power and Function of CIC

Introduction: Delhi High Court’s Ruling on CIC’s Jurisdiction

  • The Delhi High Court ruled that the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) does not have jurisdiction to comment on the utilisation of MPLADS funds by Members of Parliament (MPs).
  • The court emphasized that the scope of the Right to Information (RTI) Act is limited to providing access to information under the control of public authorities.

Expunged Remarks by CIC:

  • The court expunged certain remarks made by the CIC while dealing with an RTI application about MPLADS funds.
  • In an October 2018 order, the CIC observed that some MPs were “deliberately accumulating” MPLADS funds for the last year of their term to gain an electoral advantage.
  • The CIC suggested that the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation should implement guidelines to prevent this “abuse” and distribute the funds equally across the five-year term.
  • Justice Subramonium Prasad, in his May 15 order, stated that these observations by the CIC must be expunged.

Challenge by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation:

  • The Ministry challenged the CIC’s order, contending that the CIC exceeded its jurisdiction by commenting on the actions of MPs in spending their MPLADS funds.
  • The court noted that under Section 18 of the RTI Act, the CIC can only deal with issues related to the information being sought or the dissemination of information.

Nut Graf: The Delhi High Court ruled that the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) exceeded its jurisdiction by commenting on MPs’ use of MPLADS funds, emphasizing that the RTI Act limits the CIC to issues of information access and dissemination.

Category: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

1. Spain to join South Africa’s Gaza case at top UN court accusing Israel of genocide

Syllabus: Bilateral Groupings, Regional and global groupings 

Prelims: International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Mains: Issues of Israel and Gaza Strip

Context​: Spain has become the first European country to request permission to join South Africa’s case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza. This legal action comes amid ongoing military operations in Gaza and aims to address alleged violations of the genocide convention by Israel.

Background

  • Initial Case Filing: South Africa filed the case with the ICJ in late 2023, alleging Israel’s military actions in Gaza breach the genocide convention.
  • Court Order: The ICJ ordered Israel to halt its military offensive in Rafah but did not enforce a cease-fire for the entire Gaza Strip.

Spain’s Involvement

  • Foreign Minister’s Statement: Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares emphasized the decision was made due to the ongoing military operations in Gaza and the need for peace.
  • Role in the Case: If admitted, Spain will be able to submit written statements and participate in public hearings, further supporting the legal process.

International Support

  • Other Countries: Mexico, Colombia, Nicaragua, Libya, and the Palestinians have also requested to join the case.
  • Recognition of Palestine: Spain, along with Ireland and Norway, recognized a Palestinian state on May 28.

Israel’s Position

  • Denial of Genocide: Israel denies allegations of genocide, stating its military actions are aimed at combating Hamas, particularly following the deadly attacks on October 7.

Issues

Legal and Diplomatic Implications

  • Legal Precedents: The case could set significant precedents in international law regarding the definition and prosecution of genocide.
  • Diplomatic Tensions: Spain’s involvement may strain its diplomatic relations with Israel, reflecting broader geopolitical tensions.

Humanitarian Concerns

  • Civilian Impact: The ongoing military operations have resulted in substantial civilian casualties and infrastructure destruction in Gaza, heightening international concern.
  • Human Rights Violations: Allegations of human rights violations and war crimes have been central to the discourse on both sides.

Significance

European Involvement

  • First European Country: Spain’s request marks a notable shift in European engagement with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the judicial level.
  • Support for Palestinians: Spain’s action aligns with its broader support for Palestinian statehood and rights, reinforcing its stance on international platforms.

International Justice

  • ICJ’s Role: The involvement of multiple countries underscores the ICJ’s role in adjudicating complex international disputes and upholding international law.
  • Global Attention: The case brings significant global attention to the conflict, potentially influencing international diplomatic and humanitarian responses.

Solutions

Diplomatic Efforts

  • Peace Negotiations: Renewed international efforts to mediate peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine could be pivotal.
  • UN Involvement: Enhanced UN involvement in monitoring and facilitating humanitarian aid and conflict resolution.

Legal Mechanisms

  • ICJ Proceedings: Ensuring a fair and transparent legal process at the ICJ to address the allegations and deliver justice.
  • International Cooperation: Increased cooperation among international legal bodies and human rights organizations to support the case.

Nut Graf: Spain’s decision to join South Africa’s case against Israel at the ICJ highlights the ongoing international legal and diplomatic efforts to address the Gaza conflict. This move reflects a commitment to upholding international law and seeking justice for alleged violations, amidst broader efforts to achieve peace and stability in the region.

2. India is now ‘second-biggest foreign threat’ to Canadian democracy, says report

Syllabus: Effect of Policies and Politics of Developed and Developing Countries on India’s Interests

Mains: India-Canada relations

Context:

  • A parliamentary committee report in Canada identifies India as the second-biggest foreign threat to the country’s democracy.
  • This adds to the negative state of bilateral relations, which have been strained since the June 2023 killing of a pro-Khalistan ideologue in Surrey, British Columbia.

National Security and Intelligence Committee Report:

  • The report states, “India emerged as the second-most significant foreign interference threat to Canada’s democratic institutions and processes.”
  • Alleged interference by India has increased and expanded to include targeting Canadian politicians, ethnic media, and Indo-Canadian ethnocultural communities.
  • China is described as the topmost foreign threat to Canada’s democracy.

Diplomatic Tensions:

  • India and Canada have had heated diplomatic exchanges since the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar on June 18, 2023.
  • Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleged that Nijjar was murdered by “agents of the Government of India,” leading to India pausing visa issuance to Canadian citizens.
  • Earlier this year, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service accused foreign countries, including India, of interfering in Canada’s election process, which India denied.

Read more on India – Canada relations in the linked article.

Nut Graf: A Canadian parliamentary report identifies India as the second-biggest foreign threat to its democracy, highlighting increased interference in democratic processes. This exacerbates diplomatic tensions between the two countries, already strained by the 2023 murder of a pro-Khalistan ideologue.

G. Tidbits

Nothing here for today!!!

H. UPSC Prelims Practice Questions

Q1. Consider the following statements about the Members of Parliament Local 
Area Development Scheme (MPLADS):
  1. MPLADS funds must be used to create durable assets like physical infrastructure for health, education, etc.
  2. A specified portion of each MP’s fund must benefit SC/ST populations.
  3. MPLADS funds are sanctioned on a yearly basis and unused funds cannot be carried forward to the next year.
  4. The district authority must inspect at least 10% of all works under implementation every year.

Which of the following statements given above are correct?

  1. 1 and 2 only 
  2. 1, 2 and 4 only 
  3. 1, 3 and 4 only 
  4. 2 and 4 only
CHECK ANSWERS:-

Answer: b

Explanation: Funds are sanctioned annually, but unspent funds can be carried forward.

Q2. Consider the following statements:
  1. ‘Bhil Pradesh’ is a proposed state in India.
  2. It includes districts from Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra.
  3. One of the aims of the formation of ‘Bhil Pradesh’ is to increase reservation for Scheduled Tribes.

How many of the statements given above are correct?

  1. Only one
  2. Only two
  3. All three
  4. None
CHECK ANSWERS:-

Answer: c

Explanation: All statements regarding ‘Bhil Pradesh’ are correct.

Q3. Consider the following statements:
  1. Nata Pratha involves the sale of girls either on stamp paper or otherwise for marriage.
  2. Individuals involved in Nata Pratha can be prosecuted under laws related to human trafficking and the POCSO Act.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2
CHECK ANSWERS:-

Answer: c

Explanation: Both statements about Nata Pratha are correct.

Q4. Consider the following statements regarding the COP-29 climate conference:
  1. It will be held in Azerbaijan.
  2. The agenda includes a firm commitment to transitioning away from fossil fuels to achieve net zero by 2050.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2
CHECK ANSWERS:-

Answer: c

Explanation: Both statements about the COP-29 climate conference are correct.

Q5. Consider the following statements about the Special Marriage Act, 1954:
  1. The Act mandates a mandatory waiting period before a marriage can be conducted under its provisions.
  2. The Act provides legal recognition for same-sex marriage.
  3. The Act facilitates marriage between individuals of different religions or castes.
  4. The marriage is solemnized by a Central Government appointed official.

Which of the following statements given above are correct?

  1. 1 and 3 only
  2. 2 and 4 only 
  3. 3 and 4 only 
  4. 1, 3 and 4 only
CHECK ANSWERS:-

Answer: a

Explanation:

  • Statement 1: Correct. A notice period (30 days) needs to be given to the Marriage Officer.
  • Statement 2: Incorrect. The Act does not recognize same-sex marriage currently in India.
  • Statement 3: Correct. The Act promotes inter-religious and inter-caste marriages.
  • Statement 4: Incorrect. Marriages are solemnized by a Marriage Officer appointed by the State Government, not the Central Government.

Comments

Leave a Comment

Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published.

*

*