Integration of Princely States - Facts for UPSC Modern History

At the time of independence, there were more than 500 princely states in India that were not a part of the British Empire officially. These 500 princely states covered 48 per cent of the Pre-Independent Indian area. Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel was given the task of the integration of princely states. The Indian Independence Act of 1947 gave princely states the choice to accede to either India or Pakistan or remain independent.

In this article, you can read about the integration of these states with India through persuasion, diplomacy, military force, or plebiscite, for the IAS Exam.

Why was the Integration of the Princely States necessary?

Post-independence, one of the first and major problems that surfaced was the integration of the princely states into the concept of a single unified, uniformly administered India. Since these princely states, were patronized by the British on a large scale during the 19th and 20th centuries, they were not comfortable with the idea of giving away their power and prestige. Some of these states that posed problems were Jodhpur, Bhopal and Travancore before independence and Junagarh, Hyderabad and Kashmir post-independence.

To know what role the Doctrine of Lapse played in making the Princely State reliant on the British, visit the linked article

The newly-formed Government of India was against the idea of having independent nations within the state would only jeopardise the internal and external security of India. It was speculated that in case of an act of aggression by a foreign power, these Princely States would be used as the staging ground for an attack on the country at large. It wasn’t just the Indian Government trying to woo the Princely states but also Pakistan as well. Thus it was necessary to integrate the Princely states as soon as possible.

How were all the Princely States integrated into the Union of India?

India’s first Deputy Prime Minister, Sardar Vallabhai Patel (Born on October 31st, 1875) used a combination of political manoeuvring and brute force to integrate the Princely states. Some of his notable actions on these states are listed below:

Jodhpur: The services of the Diwan of the neighbouring state of Bikaner were used to persuade the King of Jodhpur to align herself with India. Thus, the Instrument of Accession with Jodhpur was signed.

Bhopal: After Lord Mountbatten asked the Nawab of Bhopal to sign the Instrument of Accession, he tried to avoid any integration to the Union of India by reasoning the interests of Muslims in the Hindu-dominated region will be compromised after the accession. But the people of Bhopal had realized that this was only being done to preserve the Nawab’s owns power in the state and had nothing to do with the genuine interests of any community. Hence, the Nawab had to sign the Instrument of Accession with India.

Travancore: Since Travancore (Kerala) had good reserves of natural resources, it was believed it could survive on its own and hence wanted to remain independent. The Dewan of Travancore, C. P. Ramaswami Iyer, was invited by Jawaharlal Nehru to Delhi, in an effort to persuade him, but he refused to sign the Instrument of Accession.  CP was also unpopular with the Communists of the Kingdom for his anti-communism stands. An assassination attempt was made on C. P. on 25 July 1947. From his hospital bed, he advised the King of Travancore to accede to India and thus the Instrument of Accession was signed.

Junagarh: Junagarh was a princely state which had a majority of Hindus but ruled by a Muslim ruler. It had already signed the pact with Pakistan to be a part of the latter’s territory. However, India firmly believed in the will of the people for such a decision. Hence, V.P Menon and V.B Patel tried to convince the Diwan of Junagarh (Shahnawaz Khan Bhutto) to conduct a plebiscite. But not before severing air and land links of Junagadh. Following clashes between Indian and Junaghadi armies, the Nawab fled with his family to Pakistan. His Dewan Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto, the father of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, decided to invite the Government of India to intervene and wrote a letter to Mr Buch, the regional commissioner of Saurashtra in the government of India to this effect. The subsequent plebiscite held later saw the accession of Junagadh to India.

Aspirants can chcek out the following links to prepare wholistically for the upcoming UPSC Civil Services examination –

Hyderabad: The indication that the power of the rulers of Hyderabad was short-lived, could be sensed through the events such as the movement of peasants under the communist leadership against the Jagirdars and Talukdars, the Telangana uprising, and the spread of Gandhian programmes such as Prabhat Pheri and Khadi. The Nawab of Hyderabad succeeded in mobilizing a group of orthodox Muslims called as Ittehadul Muslameen and a militia called Razakars. They challenged the idea of India and hence finally a police action was taken by the Government of India in 1948 leading to the surrender of Hyderabad on September 17 of that year. The Nawab agreed to accede Hyderabad to India. Read in detail about Hyderabad entered into Subsidiary Alliance with British on the given link. In return, he was made the Rajpramukh (Governor) of the democratic state of Hyderabad. This can be referred to as a smooth transition of the king into democracy without feeling a sense of dethronement.

Kashmir:

  1. At the time of Independence, Kashmir was neither a part of India nor Pakistan. When on 22nd Oct 1947, a section of Pakistanis backed by their army attacked Kashmir, the King of Kashmir Maharaja Hari Singh requested for help from the Indian Government. 
  2. After the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession, the Indian Army was sent to the help of Kashmir. Read more on  Jammu & Kashmir – Instrument of Accession Signed on the linked page.
  3. Finally, a ceasefire between India and Pakistan took place on 31st Dec 1948. India took this matter to the United Nations.
  4. As a result in 1951, the United Nations asked Pakistan to remove its army and asked India to hold a plebiscite in the area. However, Pakistan has not pulled its army away from the area and till today, it is a matter of conflict between the two nations.
  5. The area held by Pakistan is referred to as ‘Pak occupied Kashmir’ by India and is referred to as ‘Azad Kashmir’ by Pakistan.

Also chcek the following links –

  1. Article 370 – A constitutional History of Jammu & Kashmir
  2. Former Special Status of Jammu & Kashmir

Integration of Princely States:- Download PDF Here

The above details would be of help to candidates preparing for UPSC exams this year. You can know more about the topics asked in the exam by visiting the UPSC Syllabus page and also refer to the links given below for more articles. 

Related Links:

Leave a Comment

Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*